When I was a junior in high school my English teacher asked the class to write a creation story, seeing as we had just read one. And for the first time during my high school career there were no requirements, just to simply write a creation story. Years before I would have been overjoyed at the opportunity to use creativity and imagination in my writing. Unfortunately by the time I was a junior in high school, I hadn't done unstructured creative writing in so long that I seldom even knew what it was anymore.


2

          I don't remember exactly when the creative writing stopped, but I'm estimating that it was sometime during middle school. From then on out it was five paragraph essay, after five paragraph essay, after five paragraph essay. There were a few research papers in high school that were structured a little differently due to length, but even then there had to be an introduction, a thesis statement, the main points, the examples to back them up, and a conclusion. By the time I reached my freshmen year of college I realized that I no longer knew how to write creatively. All the creativity had been suppressed and replaced by structure. I literally didn't know how to just write any more. When I sat down to express myself in writing, there it was, the instinct to get a good thesis, to get a good introduction, to map out my main points. Why couldn't I just write to write without worrying about the structure of my writing?


3

          It's because in our education system today, unstructured creative writing is almost non-existent. Students are continuously taught structure, which most often is not a bad thing. But when the five paragraph essay becomes what is expected and is consistently pounded into students' minds, it leaves little room for creativity. Throughout the middle school years, students are taught the five paragraph essay as the only acceptable structure of writing, and by the time they reach high school the only difference in what is expected, is the length of their essays. So when the students reach the college and university level, all creativity as far as writing is concerned has gone out the window.


2

          Not to be misconstrued, structure is incredibly important and should be taught in the classroom. My concern is that structured writing is the only thing taught in the classroom due to the fact that the focus of education today is on measuring student achievement through standardized testing, which leaves little time or opportunity for creative writing. When I originally decided to become an English teacher it was because I wanted to change the way things were done and reintroduce creativity back into the subject. I don't want to get rid of critical thinking or analysis and I believe that students' success on standardized tests are important, but at what costs?


1

          Even Peter Elbow's so called "free" writing exercises have structure. There are rules to exactly how a person should freewrite. It's recommended to write for at least ten minutes possibly later increasing the time. Along with that, the writing can never stop even if the writer has essentially nothing to say and nothing can be crossed out. Yes the rules contribute to the point of the freewriting exercise, which according to Elbow is to free the writer of the constant editing and reviewing during the writing that is instinct to our thought process. But maybe if there was more unstructured creative writing in our education system, editing while we wrote wouldn't get in the way as much.


7

          And once again as I stated before, structured writing is incredibly important in the academics, however due to this there is a complete lack of unstructured creative writing. More creative writing needs to be implemented in the classroom along side of structured writing. Unfortunately this itself creates another problem, what's the right balance between structured and unstructured writing? In general, it would appear that the majority of emphasis should be put on structured writing, but still with adequate emphasis on creative writing as well. Then again, many times it could be situational with the environment of the students. For example, look at the Freedom Writers. Here were kids that were not expected to do well academically and therefore were not taught the traditional structured writing or any kind of writing for that matter, at all. But when one teacher decided to ask the students to just write with no structure imposed on them, the students blossomed into writers with incredible stories. If their teacher had asked them to write about a certain topic every day with a certain structure, yes maybe some of the students would have written something decently acceptable. But it can also be assumed within reason that many of the students would have written some thing "unacceptable" and then probably would have given up writing all together. Because there were no boundaries for the students, they ended up becoming not only interested in writing but also fairly decent writers. Hence in this case, more emphasis on unstructured writing proved to be beneficial. Why? Because structure often equals limitation. And while limitation can be a good thing and is necessary at times, it hinders creativity.


4

          So it's important for educators to include in the curriculum unstructured writing, at least occasionally. Because while I'm grateful for being taught and having the knowledge of how to write a good solid research paper and a good solid five paragraph essay, I'm disappointed that creative writing now comes as a struggle for me. So the question becomes how much creative and unstructured writing should be allowed in the classroom? Many would argue that none whatsoever should be implemented and that how things are in our education system today are perfectly fine. While others may agree with me that while there should definitely be more emphasis on creativity, it probably shouldn't be a huge emphasis. And then there's probably those who think the emphasis on creative writing should be at least comparable to that of structured writing.

           

             

           

Posted by doutrich on September 14, 2008
Tags Uncategorized

Total comments on this page: 37

How to read/write comments

Comments on specific paragraphs:

Click the icon to the right of a paragraph

  • If there are no prior comments there, a comment entry form will appear automatically
  • If there are already comments, you will see them and the form will be at the bottom of the thread

Comments on the page as a whole:

Click the icon to the right of the page title (works the same as paragraphs)

Comments

No comments yet.

historymajor255 on paragraph 7:

I think you could end a little srtronger in your last few sentences. I think your middle school 5 paragraph essay training is coming back and you are just reiderating your previous points. Maybe explain how your education or how your future could be different if you had learned how to write differently, or talk about what you’ve done to overcome this problem, or maybe reiderate with more fullness what you plan to do as a teacher to overcome this problem.
~Katie M.

September 16, 2008 12:14 pm
historymajor255 on whole page :

When i started reading this paper I wanted to make corrections on the sentence structure and the style of writing you used, but as I continued to read I realized that your writing style really grabbed my attention. The conversational tone you use makes me want to keep reading and yours is the first paper that i read from beginning to end without making comments. I didn’t stop because I was intrigued and wanted to keep reading, your paper flows incredibly well. I’m very impressed with this paper, even though it is my personal style, it really held my attention. The only improvements I would suggest is maybe to read the paper allowed, there are a few places where your words get a little jumbled, and also look at my comments for your conclusion. Great paper, thanks.
~Katie M. marc7308@bears.unco.edu

September 16, 2008 12:19 pm
mjt42 on paragraph 4:

i love how clear you make your argument while still presenting the other side.

September 16, 2008 12:55 pm
mjt42 on paragraph 6:

i like your example, i think it was bizzel who had a similar point?

September 16, 2008 12:58 pm
mjt42 on whole page :

even though you present two sides of the argument you point was still clear and concise, and i love that you paper was insightful and well written

September 16, 2008 1:01 pm
Steve on paragraph 3:

Reword the first line in this paragraph. There is an awkward transision between the last paragraph and this one. Consider eliminating “It’s because in our.” The readers will know that when you talk about education after the previous paragraph, that is the reason.

September 18, 2008 7:27 am
Steve on whole page :

You have a good voice. Your paper flows well and is enjoyable to read. I would suggest that you reorganize your last paragraph. It sort of tapers off without giving the reader more closure. I recommend that you place your view on the topic at the end of the paragraph. This will allow us to think about your posistion and not someone elses. Also, summarize again why you think there should be more emphasis on creative writing and place that next to your line that talks about your viewpoint on the topic.

September 18, 2008 7:34 am
mattl on paragraph 6:

We’ve got the point I don’t think you need to re-refer to your belief in structure

September 18, 2008 1:23 pm
matt on paragraph 7:

You came to a conclusion but it lacks punch I don’t think you have to state everyones view … just maybe that there are some that will disagree …

September 18, 2008 1:27 pm
nono8 on whole page :

You presented your argument very well. I enjoyed reading your paper because your thoughts were well-organized and you had a casual, relatable tone. I felt like some of the questions you answered in your conclusion could have been asked more towards the beginning of the paper. Thanks for sharing your paper.
~Noel

September 19, 2008 9:37 am
nono8 on paragraph 7:

Perhaps you might consider asking the question about “how much creative and unstructured writing should be allowed in the classroom?” more towards the beginning of the paper so your reader knows that is the point you are trying to address.

September 19, 2008 9:44 am
Katie B. on whole page :

You have a way with words, you were able to grab my attention…your paper is great and well structured. I believe that the more you write the better it will get. GREAT JOB!!
thx,
Katie

September 19, 2008 12:59 pm
Nicole on paragraph 5:

Good point with your last sentence!

September 20, 2008 5:23 pm
Nicole on paragraph 6:

I like that you used an outside example to support your idea.

September 20, 2008 5:24 pm
Nicole on whole page :

This was an excellent paper and you have a really great topic to write about. I agree with some of the other commenters about your voice and casual tone being a driving force of this essay, but you should go over it again and make sure your sentence structure is sound and easy to understand. Nice job!

September 20, 2008 5:27 pm
stan4562 on paragraph 6:

Can you make this a less lengthly paragraph??

September 21, 2008 9:01 am
stan4562 on whole page :

Good job taking a look at two sides, yet sticking to your chosen point of view. Really great voice throughout the paper. Don’t really have any correction suggestions at the moment.

September 21, 2008 9:04 am
hein9311 on whole page :

Good essay, many sentance structure and gramatical errors but that’s okay you definitely get your point across and I like how you’ve made it easy to read. I found myself flying through this essay intrigued to read on.
I would disagree that structured writing is taking over the classroom in high schools, my high school teachers really stressed creativity and autonomous writing but that’s just me. That said, if there are high schools out there that are losing their connection with creative writing this essay would convince many teachers to change their cirriculum — were you in debate in high school? you make many good points to back your view.
Overall very persuasive, very good argument, I personally would do a little more editing but, again, that’s just me. Well done!

September 21, 2008 9:13 am
Kayla on paragraph 7:

I’m not sure I care for your conclusion. The rest of your paper is great, but then you throw sort of a curve ball. Your last few sentences sound a lot like the “review” of the traditional paper (meaning you map out in the beginning what you will say, you say it, and then you review what you said). The rest of your paper doesn’t have that structure, but by pointing out those three different kinds of people/opinions, it makes it sound like the paper should have, and leaves the reader searching the paper again for them. Hope that helps! :-)

September 21, 2008 11:36 am
Kayla on paragraph 6:

There is quite a bit of information in this paragraph and the first reading of it seems jumbled and confusing. When reading it again I can see that there are some really good points and ideas, a nice look at the different issue of balance between the two types of writing. so, I’m not sure how you would do it, but maybe break this up or have a more clear-cut sentence breaking up the two, perhaps stronger language in those first couple of paragraphs to make it more clear? Great job though, these really are great points…especially bringing in the Freedom Writers as evidence.

September 21, 2008 11:42 am
Sarah Shinners on paragraph 2:

Good paragraph. I think it’s interesting that you realized that all essays were supposed to have the same structure and you couldn’t remember how to write creatively. It sets up nicely your main argument, points to the fact that you would like to see more creative writing.

September 21, 2008 12:21 pm
Sarah Shinners on paragraph 3:

Don’t start the first sentence with “It.” You can’t really tell what “it” refers to. Also there’s one sentence that has an extra comma.

September 21, 2008 12:22 pm
Sarah Shinners on paragraph 4:

Oh standardized tests. That’s a whole other subject for debate. But I agree, you do present the other side, which is good. So your argument becomes that you don’t want structure to be the only thing taught. Good point.

September 21, 2008 12:24 pm
Sarah Shinners on paragraph 6:

Don’t start the first sentence with “As I’ve said before…” Just get rid of that phrase entirely. I like your example of the freedom writers, but like others have said I think this paragraph is a bit lengthy. You’re kind of just repeating things you’ve already said. So I would try cutting a few of the more repetitive sentences. And the first few sentences had awkward wording. I think you should just stick to the example of the Freedom Writers to show how structure can be limiting, and that’s it. You don’t necessarily need to directly state it again.

September 21, 2008 12:29 pm
Sarah Shinners on paragraph 6:

I would work on the conclusion some more. It doesn’t really wow me. Try to end it with a sentence that is more resounding. You could tell us what you think about how much emphasis should be placed on unstructured writing. Or if you don’t know, then just end it with that question. Either way, the last sentence needs something more. And also, don’t start the first sentence with “So.” It sounds fine without it.

September 21, 2008 12:33 pm
Sarah Shinners on whole page :

Overall a good paper. I like your arguments for both sides, and I like the example you brought in with the Freedom Writers. It really supported what you were trying to say. The only things to work on are your conclusion and a few sentences throughout the paper that had awkward wording, especially the first few sentences in the second to last paragraph. Otherwise, a good paper, and very clear on what you were arguing. good job!

September 21, 2008 12:35 pm
bballd2123 on paragraph 2:

I really like this paragraph. Not only can people relate to it, but its a great point! This is why, I think, teachers should allow time for their students to free-write or do creative writings.
Maria

September 21, 2008 1:15 pm
bballd2123 on whole page :

I really liked your paper, I think it showed your voice and you explained your thinking very well. I don’t know what I would change, maybe add some quotes?
Maria

September 21, 2008 1:17 pm
Jacqueline Van Hazel on whole page :

I really enjoyed your topic, about including more unstructured, creative writing in the classroom. Also, your personal experiences really help your reader identify with your argument. At least I was; personally I understand exactly you’re point when you say you, “literally forgot how to just write.” I do have a suggestion though. I felt at times that you were repeating some of the same sentences over and over again. Some of those sentences should be omitted, but I think if you used a thesaurus you could find a better way to re-word some of those sentences so they flow better in your essay. For example: At the beginning of paragraph six, I think that the first sentence should be omitted. It makes the paragraph sound less repetitive, and it brings out your voice more. Good essay.

Sincerely,
Jacqueline

September 21, 2008 1:55 pm
Rachel Hillmer on whole page :

I really enjoyed reading your paper. I thought your personal anecdote of how much you loved and now miss your old creative writing style added a great level of voice and depth to your essay. I did find myself wondering what kind of creative writing would you like to implement in your future classroom. Having students keep a diary, short stories, etc.

This was a very nicely written paper and i hope my comments were helpful.

Rachel Hillmer

September 21, 2008 2:52 pm
prat9517 on whole page :

I think this paper is great. I think the only thing you need to do is look at the way you word your sentences.

Good job!

-Ian

September 21, 2008 5:36 pm
Kara on whole page :

Audra,
Thanks for sharing your paper.
I really loved the flow of your writing style.
You made some excellent points, your conclusion could be a little bit stronger.
I also think that you could restate your ideas for using these points in a classroom.
Excellent paper!
Thank you
-Kara Jay

September 21, 2008 8:26 pm
Brianna on whole page :

Audra,

I like how you’ve incorporated an example from the story of the Freedom Writers.

You end with a question: How much creative and unstructured writing should be allowed in the classroom? How would you answer this question?

Good job.

-Brianna

September 21, 2008 8:40 pm
David N. on paragraph 3:

Great point you make in your first sentence. It is poignant, and straight to the point.

September 21, 2008 8:50 pm
David N. on whole page :

Good essay, great points. Not much I could see that you need to improve on, but just polishing up your essay.

September 21, 2008 8:52 pm
Chelsea on whole page :

Wow!! I loved your paper and I wouldn’t change a thing except some mechanics but otherwise I love the content.

September 21, 2008 9:09 pm
mbirely on whole page :

Audra,
I really enjoyed reading your paper. The personal story you tell is a perfect example. I like the direction you took your paper in. There is not much I would change, maybe spend some more time on the conclusion and add to your ideas there. You paper was great though!
Thanks for sharing!
-Meagan Birely-

September 21, 2008 11:29 pm
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

Create an account (optional) | Login